Mikael Torpegaard vs Thomaz Bellucci Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L L L
Form
W L L L L W W L L LHead To Head: Torpegaard 2 - 0 Bellucci
They have played 4 sets in total, with Torpegaard winning 4 and Bellucci winning 0. The last match between Torpegaard and Bellucci was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 19-04-2021, First, Clay with Mikael Torpegaard getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mikael Torpegaard | 2 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | 0 |
Tallahassee Challenger(19-04-2021)
7
6
7
5
| Torpegaard | Stats | Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 899 |
| 166 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 30 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 5 | Titles | 14 |
| 58% (152-112) | Career Total W/L | 54% (481-414) |
| $89,705 | Career Prize Money | $2,594,025 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Torpegaard VS Bellucci H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 7-5 |
Stats 
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Torpegaard VS Bellucci H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:23:39 | Average Match Time | 1:23:39 |
| 53% (66/124) | 1st Serve % | 54% (68/126) |
| 79% (52/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (44/68) |
| 60% (35/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (24/58) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 46% (58/126) | Return Points Win % | 30% (37/124) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mikael Torpegaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
3-6 6-0 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Kaichi Uchida
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
51%
(
54 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
47%
(
60 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
107
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Andrew Harris
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Max Jacob Schnur
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
9
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Harrison
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomaz Bellucci Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Jurgen Briand
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Luke Johnson
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
53%
(
68 of
129)
1st Serve %
67%
(
86 of
128)
10
Aces
14
9
Double Faults
6
84%
(
57 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
66 of
86)
57%
(
35 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
37 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
39 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(8) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
58 of
70)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (152/112) | Win/Loss | 54% (481/414) |
| 56% (345/271) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1177/1058) |
| 53% (3052/2757) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11038/10622) |
| 51% (40/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (96/119) |
| 64% (53/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (344/239) |
| 60% (58/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (35/42) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 30% (6/14) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1068 | Aces Total | 3583 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 720 | Total Double Faults | 2098 |
| 1:17:29 | Average Match Time | 1:8:21 |
| 554.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 552.07 |
| 58% (8878/15191) | 1st Serve % | 58% (30160/51678) |
| 71% (6342/8878) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (21159/30155) |
| 50% (3183/6313) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (11070/21601) |
| 43% (676/1558) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1920/4817) |
| 40% (6261/15690) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20184/52631) |
| 31% (5/11) | Slam W/L | 47% (35/39) |
| 0% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 46% (50/59) |
| 50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 56% (19/15) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (144/122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (89/71) | Challenger W/L | 60% (178/121) |
| 72% (51/20) | Futures W/L | 49% (52/55) |
| 58% (147/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (435/795) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (40/91) |
| 51% (43/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (172/347) |
| 52% (43/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (161/323) |
| 83% (162/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (482/387) |
| 17% (162/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (482/93) |
| 17% (102/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (413/92) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
